News Release
SIU Closes Investigation into Wellington County Vehicle Death
Case Number: 10-PVD-020
Other News Releases Related to Case 10-PVD-020
Update: SIU Continues Investigation into Wellington County Vehicle Death
SIU Investigates Vehicle Death in Wellington County
SIU Investigates Vehicle Death in Wellington County
The SIU assigned five investigators and four forensic investigators to probe the circumstances of this incident. The investigation found that the following events took place on February 11th:
* In the early hours of that day, 25-year-old David King was driving southbound along Hwy 23 from Harriston to Palmerston. This stretch of Hwy 23 is a straight two lane road in good repair with a posted 80 km/hr speed limit. The roadway was clear and dry at that time.
* As Mr. King was traveling southbound, a marked cruiser driven by the subject officer passed him in the opposite direction. The officer could not see a rear license plate on Mr. King's vehicle in his rear view mirror, and so he slowed down, executed a U-turn, and activated his emergency lights in an attempt to stop Mr. King's vehicle.
* Almost immediately thereafter, Mr. King's Chevrolet Impala veered into the northbound lane and collided with a Mercury Sable being driven by Ms. McNally. Ms McNally died instantly as a result of the collision and her passenger Mr. Maxwell received serious but non-life threatening injuries. Mr. King was treated at the Palmerston Hospital and released the following day.
Director Scott said, "These events happened so quickly that it is unlikely that the subject officer's actions amounted to a suspect apprehension pursuit as defined by the Police Services Act. The officer was attempting to signal Mr. King's vehicle to stop, but it is unclear whether he had actually entered into a pursuit before the Impala caused this fatal collision. According to the accident reconstruction report, the distance between the U-turn of the subject officer's cruiser and the point of impact between the Impala and the Sable was 800 metres. Assuming for the moment that the subject officer had entered into a pursuit, he had the lawful authority to do so under s. 3 of the same regulation in order to identify either the vehicle or the driver. Be that as it may, any actions taken by the subject officer in relation to this incident fall well below the threshold of criminal liability as defined by the Criminal Code."
If you or someone you know has been negatively affected by an incident under SIU investigation and would like support, the Affected Persons Program is here to help. You can reach us at 1-877-641-1897. Support is free, confidential, and available 24/7, every day of the year.
The SIU is an independent government agency that investigates the conduct of officials (municipal, regional and provincial police officers, police officers with the Nishnawbe Aski Police Service, special constables with the Niagara Parks Commission and peace officers with the Legislative Protective Service) that may have resulted in death, serious injury, sexual assault and/or the discharge of a firearm at a person. All investigations are conducted by SIU investigators who are civilians. Under the Special Investigations Unit Act, the Director of the SIU must
- consider whether the official has committed a criminal offence in connection with the incident under investigation
- depending on the evidence, cause a criminal charge to be laid against the official where grounds exist for doing so, or close the file without any charges being laid
- publicly report the results of its investigations